Methodology
Our Review Methodology
Eight criteria decide what a full review contains. None of them has been applied yet: no operator has been field-tested, so no score and no rating is published anywhere on this site. The criteria below describe what a review will contain once the protocol has been run, not what has already happened.
We look the trade name up in the public register and record the date. Operators absent from it are not listed at all.
A review will compare average overrounds against at least three competitors in the same market. Not yet run for any operator.
A review will weigh the headline offer against its wagering requirements, time limits and eligible markets. Not yet run for any operator.
A review will time a real deposit and withdrawal through local payment methods, and publish both timestamps. Not yet run for any operator.
A review will rate app stability, navigation and live-betting performance on Android and iOS. Not yet run for any operator.
A review will contact support unannounced and record response and resolution times. Not yet run for any operator.
A review will check self-exclusion tools, deposit limits and reality checks inside the account. Not yet run for any operator.
A review will count pre-match and in-play markets on the sports that matter locally. Not yet run for any operator.
The Gaming Commission register, transcribed with the date we read it →
Who publishes GambleCode, and who pays for it →